http://mcjabberwock.livejournal.com/ (
mcjabberwock.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
vitalidrobishev
2020-09-05 12:41 am (UTC)
no subject
Apparently, Navalny’s biomaterials were flown to Moscow's Nii Sklif lab which didn't find any traces of the poison. But they used an American Agilent Technologies GC-MS [1], while Bundeswehr toxicology lab reportedly used an order of magnitude more sensitive, and more expensive, Bruker's apex-Qe FTMS (no official source for this as "Bundeswehr didn’t disclose the details of their work") which successfully detected novichok.
How did German scientists outplay their Russian counterparts in this case and could it be attributed to simply using a more sensitive equipment with perhaps a better MS method?
Разумеется, это всего лишь предположение специалистов, которые по меньшей мере понимают в оборудовании и в курсе, где какое используется.
(
92 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
Apparently, Navalny’s biomaterials were flown to Moscow's Nii Sklif lab which didn't find any traces of the poison. But they used an American Agilent Technologies GC-MS [1], while Bundeswehr toxicology lab reportedly used an order of magnitude more sensitive, and more expensive, Bruker's apex-Qe FTMS (no official source for this as "Bundeswehr didn’t disclose the details of their work") which successfully detected novichok.
How did German scientists outplay their Russian counterparts in this case and could it be attributed to simply using a more sensitive equipment with perhaps a better MS method?
Разумеется, это всего лишь предположение специалистов, которые по меньшей мере понимают в оборудовании и в курсе, где какое используется.